32
an explanation which the Frustee wondered how Ken
Ken Satisfarting
but he have just been able to get a copy mail before the Mother of interdict was laid to him - he again asks for the Enquiry with his charges against the Chief Justice than affinis to have heard an interview with the framing
writes pointing out that instead of
before the 5th November. When he
Zain
obtaining the Enquiry asked for upon the September he is called upon to answer the accusation of the Chief Justice for matter attique than occurred on Oct. 21st asks that the Governor will facilitate his pleaing on regard the proof Gerlich den proposes to substantiate the changes made, & which he desires to add to as much in the intent of the public as for his own vindication
& Loverun
The reply is a formal requisition dec_16th November
to answer a
charge of
Deliberate insubordination in
making his public utterance of 21st October __
Gr
* Sitton's defence of November 9th shinee bread (0.17)
a it must be remembered that he had previously
to the alleged offence - rigidifying appeal to the
+ as far as I can see no answer
Governor to interfere, so that the delittings of
may be the result of a Judging that
his insubordination
him no
such language
the proper a only arbiter in the Colony would fir
At the same time nothing could
e justify (filers used; he is wildly wrong headed impracticable - but he had made undoubted
arr
Sinovcation : and it is very difficult not to
confirm his
a
tas Jension. It is clear he cannot go back again - will it do to tell him that the Sec. of State is unable to deal
anything in these papers which justified an officer in his
A.
taking
position in employing such a course
for publishing his utterance,
or in speaking of the Chief Justice in the terms which he Explozende
His action renders it impossible
In the Lee. State to re-instate him in his ruling that the fault has been entirely
Affine.
hauben
on
his
the
5 Rimbuly instead of conforming
Lide
only
Low
duspension will allow him to resign
MW. Sibbons writes copiously & inaccurately to
Much to
that it is not very clear what changes he makes against the Chief Justice Except that of insulting him on all
occasions - but his Jusistency in demanding enquiry Should at last have Received sufficient attention to prevent his saying that all enquiry was refused;
he has not he told me the other day).
In John's
same diary replies from
# (Chief Justice letters of October 15. & 29 (in 18925).
Gra
The only
for
answer; & they show badly Zn die John, she Comp. In the first letter he gives his account opponents Japure on the 26th Jafil, he that depens br The day of Sir John's discrediting Exhibition of himself Ler the Daily Joufs Exhaut derwitt
36 945-
~ Sillon
for that day
became too arrogant in time & tarmen
"it is odd that Sir John should
ask him to dinner three times (on the 5th 11th 18th Tay) incrudiaty after it
It will also be seen
32
an explanation which the Frusteel wonder how ken
Ken Satisfarting
bat he have gist ken able to get a copy mail before the Mother of interdict was lead to him - he again asks for the Enguing with bis charges against the Chief Justic than affinis to have heard an interview with the framin
writes fointing out that instead of
before the 5th Novemben. When he
Zain
obtaining the Engoing asked for upon the September he is called upon to answer the accusation of the Chief Justice for matter attique than occurre on Oct. 212 asks that the forerna will facilitate his plaing on regard the proosß Gerlich den propres to substantiate the changes mach, & which ha disines to add to as much in the intent of the public as for his non vindication
& Loverun
The reply is a formal requisition dec_16th November
to answer a
chaves of
Deliberate insubordination in
making his public utteranen of 21th. Actober __
Gr
* Sittons defence of November 9th shinee bread (0.17)
a it must be remembine that he had previously
to the allique offener - rigidifting appealue to the
+ as far as Iran see vrecione no austser
Governor to interfire, so that the delittings of
may be the noult of a Juling that
his insubordination
him no
such language
the proper a only arbiter in the Colony would fir
At the same time nothing could
e justify ( filbers used; he is widntly wrong headed impracticable - but he had maine undoubted
arr من
Sinovcation : and it is very difficult not to
confirm his
a
tas Jension. It is clear he cones not go back agains - will it do to tell him that the Sec. offtate is unath to dea
anything in these Jafers which justified an office in his
A.
taking.
position in employing such a conse
for publishing his giewanen,
or in spanking of the Chief Justier in the terms which de Explozende
His action rendus ith imporsitte
In the Lee. Atate to re-instate him in his fuling that the fault has been entirely
Affine.
hauben
on
his
the
5 Rimbuly instead of conforming
Lide
only
Low
duspension will allow him to resign
MW. Sibbons writes copiously & inaccurately to Much to
that it is not very chan what changes he makes againsh the thich Justice Except that of insulting him on alle
occasions - but his Jusistency in demanding enquing Should at last have Recioul sufficient attention to prevent his daying that all enquiry was refused;
Le has not he told me the other day).
In Johnis
sam dary replies from
# (hich Justice letters of October 15. & 29 (in 18925).
Gra
The only
for
answas; & they show badly Zn die John, she Comp. In the first letter he gives his account oppohants Japure on the 26th Jafil, he that deppens br The day of Sir John's discreditith Exhibition ofhimself Ler the Daily Joufs Exhaut derwitt
36 945-
~ Sillon
for that day
became to arrogart in time & tarmen
"it is oohl that Sir John should
ask him to dinner to three times (on the 5th 11th 18th Tay) incrudiaty after it
It will also be sen
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.